BeCited vs AirOps
An enterprise “AI Search” platform that pairs visibility insights with large-scale content generation and workflows.
AirOps positions itself as AI Search for enterprise: visibility insights across ChatGPT, Google, Perplexity and traditional search, then acting on them with content tooling: Quill for generation, Grids, Workflows, and a Brand Kit: wired into 30+ AI models, 10+ CMS platforms, and SEO data providers like Semrush, Ahrefs, and Moz. Its plans are metered in “tasks”: a free Insights tier at $0/month with 1,000 tasks, Solo and Pro tiers measured in tens of thousands of content tasks (prices shown after sign-in), and custom Enterprise. It is a content-production engine with visibility attached.
BeCited is the opposite shape: loop-first, not production-first. One audit returns a deterministic CITE score for AI answers and an SEO Health score for classic search, each with a prioritized fix list, and every re-run is diffed against the last so progress is provable: no task meter, no seat of a content factory. If your bottleneck is publishing volume, AirOps is built for that; if it is knowing whether AI engines actually cite you and closing that gap, that is the loop BeCited runs.
| BeCited | AirOps | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Free instant report; paid from $39/mo (SEO) or $79/mo (GEO) | Free Insights tier ($0, 1,000 tasks/mo); paid tiers metered in tasks, prices shown after sign-in |
| Model | Fixed-price plans; audit depth scales by tier | Task-metered (overage ~$0.025/task on Solo); built around content-production volume |
| Scoring model | Deterministic CITE + SEO scores, 0-100; the same re-run gives the same score | Visibility insights and opportunities; a repeatable 0-100 score not claimed on their site |
| Classic SEO track | SEO Health score in the same audit and fix list | Traditional-search visibility alongside AI; no standalone SEO Health score claimed |
| Fix loop | Prioritized fix list on every audit; fix tracker diffs each re-run against the last | Content refresh and offsite-mention tracking; no diffed fix-tracker claimed |
| Free tier | Free instant report, no signup and no card | Free Insights tier + 14-day trial with credits |
| MCP + API | MCP server + REST API, free teaser depth without a key | Workflows/API and 30+ model integrations; MCP not claimed |
AirOps details read from their public site on 2026-07-25. Their product moves; check their pricing page before deciding.
Choose AirOps if
- Your bottleneck is content volume and you want generation, workflows, and a CMS pipeline in one place.
- You need deep integration across 30+ AI models and 10+ CMS platforms.
- You are an enterprise buying a content-operations platform, not a single audit.
Choose BeCited if
- You want a deterministic, repeatable score rather than an insights feed measured in tasks.
- You want AI visibility and classic SEO in one audit with one prioritized fix list.
- You want to start free with no task meter and prove what each fix changed on the next re-run.
The fastest comparison is a measurement.
Run the free BeCited report on your domain and see your CITE and SEO scores in seconds. No card, no call.